Bringing the latest Evidence-based Clinical Practices to US Physicians
Home | Advisory Board | Contact | Help | Sitemap  
 
Advanced search 
Login to participate
Forgot password
Register here >>

 Clinical Cardiology

DVT Prophylaxis


Emergency Physicians


Interventional Cardiology


PE Prophylaxis


Pharmacists


Special Risk Populations


Surgery


VTE Treatment



Expert Commentary
Thrombosis Podcasts
Live Presentations
Case Studies
Slide Kits
Publications
Symposia Highlights
Meeting Highlights
Latest News
Clinical Trials Corner
Registries Corner
CME Learning Center
CE Learning Center
Resource Room
Advisory Board

About Us
Contact Us
  

 


   
 




Content for site developed under the guidance of the TRACK Advisory Council.

You are here: Home / Expert Commentary /

 Pharmacoeconomics of Low-molecular-weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin  Printer-friendly version
 
 
Interview
Read and listen to interview

Biography
Go to biography

In this expert commentary, Prof Lee Vermeulen discusses the economic benefits of using thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. A search of the literature shows that the positive economic consequences of thromboprophylaxis have been demonstrated in a variety of settings.1,2 Prof Vermeulen discusses which end points to take note of when reviewing a pharmacoeconomic study.

References

1. McGarry LJ, Thompson D, Weinstein MC, Goldhaber SZ. Cost effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in acutely ill medical inpatients. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:632-642.

2. Offord R, Lloyd AC, Anderson P, Bearne A. Economic evaluation of enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26:214-220.



  
© 2009 Elsevier. All rights reserved.


Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy